Electrification
Mapped: Solar Power by Country in 2021
Mapped: Solar Power by Country in 2021
The world is adopting renewable energy at an unprecedented pace, and solar power is leading the way.
Despite a 4.5% fall in global energy demand in 2020, renewable energy technologies showed promising progress. While the growth in renewables was strong across the board, solar power led from the front with 127 gigawatts installed in 2020, its largest-ever annual capacity expansion.
The above infographic uses data from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) to map solar power capacity by country in 2021. This includes both solar photovoltaic (PV) and concentrated solar power capacity.
The Solar Power Leaderboard
From the Americas to Oceania, countries in virtually every continent (except Antarctica) added more solar to their mix last year. Here’s a snapshot of solar power capacity by country at the beginning of 2021:
Country | Installed capacity, megawatts | Watts* per capita | % of world total |
---|---|---|---|
China 🇨🇳 | 254,355 | 147 | 35.6% |
U.S. 🇺🇸 | 75,572 | 231 | 10.6% |
Japan 🇯🇵 | 67,000 | 498 | 9.4% |
Germany 🇩🇪 | 53,783 | 593 | 7.5% |
India 🇮🇳 | 39,211 | 32 | 5.5% |
Italy 🇮🇹 | 21,600 | 345 | 3.0% |
Australia 🇦🇺 | 17,627 | 637 | 2.5% |
Vietnam 🇻🇳 | 16,504 | 60 | 2.3% |
South Korea 🇰🇷 | 14,575 | 217 | 2.0% |
Spain 🇪🇸 | 14,089 | 186 | 2.0% |
United Kingdom 🇬🇧 | 13,563 | 200 | 1.9% |
France 🇫🇷 | 11,733 | 148 | 1.6% |
Netherlands 🇳🇱 | 10,213 | 396 | 1.4% |
Brazil 🇧🇷 | 7,881 | 22 | 1.1% |
Turkey 🇹🇷 | 6,668 | 73 | 0.9% |
South Africa 🇿🇦 | 5,990 | 44 | 0.8% |
Taiwan 🇹🇼 | 5,817 | 172 | 0.8% |
Belgium 🇧🇪 | 5,646 | 394 | 0.8% |
Mexico 🇲🇽 | 5,644 | 35 | 0.8% |
Ukraine 🇺🇦 | 5,360 | 114 | 0.8% |
Poland 🇵🇱 | 3,936 | 34 | 0.6% |
Canada 🇨🇦 | 3,325 | 88 | 0.5% |
Greece 🇬🇷 | 3,247 | 258 | 0.5% |
Chile 🇨🇱 | 3,205 | 142 | 0.4% |
Switzerland 🇨🇭 | 3,118 | 295 | 0.4% |
Thailand 🇹🇭 | 2,988 | 43 | 0.4% |
United Arab Emirates 🇦🇪 | 2,539 | 185 | 0.4% |
Austria 🇦🇹 | 2,220 | 178 | 0.3% |
Czech Republic 🇨🇿 | 2,073 | 194 | 0.3% |
Hungary 🇭🇺 | 1,953 | 131 | 0.3% |
Egypt 🇪🇬 | 1,694 | 17 | 0.2% |
Malaysia 🇲🇾 | 1,493 | 28 | 0.2% |
Israel 🇮🇱 | 1,439 | 134 | 0.2% |
Russia 🇷🇺 | 1,428 | 7 | 0.2% |
Sweden 🇸🇪 | 1,417 | 63 | 0.2% |
Romania 🇷🇴 | 1,387 | 71 | 0.2% |
Jordan 🇯🇴 | 1,359 | 100 | 0.2% |
Denmark 🇩🇰 | 1,300 | 186 | 0.2% |
Bulgaria 🇧🇬 | 1,073 | 152 | 0.2% |
Philippines 🇵🇭 | 1,048 | 9 | 0.1% |
Portugal 🇵🇹 | 1,025 | 81 | 0.1% |
Argentina 🇦🇷 | 764 | 17 | 0.1% |
Pakistan 🇵🇰 | 737 | 6 | 0.1% |
Morocco 🇲🇦 | 734 | 6 | 0.1% |
Slovakia 🇸🇰 | 593 | 87 | 0.1% |
Honduras 🇭🇳 | 514 | 53 | 0.1% |
Algeria 🇩🇿 | 448 | 10 | 0.1% |
El Salvador 🇸🇻 | 429 | 66 | 0.1% |
Iran 🇮🇷 | 414 | 5 | 0.1% |
Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦 | 409 | 12 | 0.1% |
Finland 🇫🇮 | 391 | 39 | 0.1% |
Dominican Republic 🇩🇴 | 370 | 34 | 0.1% |
Peru 🇵🇪 | 331 | 10 | 0.05% |
Singapore 🇸🇬 | 329 | 45 | 0.05% |
Bangladesh 🇧🇩 | 301 | 2 | 0.04% |
Slovenia 🇸🇮 | 267 | 128 | 0.04% |
Uruguay 🇺🇾 | 256 | 74 | 0.04% |
Yemen 🇾🇪 | 253 | 8 | 0.04% |
Iraq 🇮🇶 | 216 | 5 | 0.03% |
Cambodia 🇰🇭 | 208 | 12 | 0.03% |
Cyprus 🇨🇾 | 200 | 147 | 0.03% |
Panama 🇵🇦 | 198 | 46 | 0.03% |
Luxembourg 🇱🇺 | 195 | 244 | 0.03% |
Malta 🇲🇹 | 184 | 312 | 0.03% |
Indonesia 🇮🇩 | 172 | 1 | 0.02% |
Cuba 🇨🇺 | 163 | 14 | 0.02% |
Belarus 🇧🇾 | 159 | 17 | 0.02% |
Senegal 🇸🇳 | 155 | 8 | 0.02% |
Norway 🇳🇴 | 152 | 17 | 0.02% |
Lithuania 🇱🇹 | 148 | 37 | 0.02% |
Namibia 🇳🇦 | 145 | 55 | 0.02% |
New Zealand 🇳🇿 | 142 | 29 | 0.02% |
Estonia 🇪🇪 | 130 | 98 | 0.02% |
Bolivia 🇧🇴 | 120 | 10 | 0.02% |
Oman 🇴🇲 | 109 | 21 | 0.02% |
Colombia 🇨🇴 | 107 | 2 | 0.01% |
Kenya 🇰🇪 | 106 | 2 | 0.01% |
Guatemala 🇬🇹 | 101 | 6 | 0.01% |
Croatia 🇭🇷 | 85 | 17 | 0.01% |
World total 🌎 | 713,970 | 83 | 100.0% |
*1 megawatt = 1,000,000 watts.
China is the undisputed leader in solar installations, with over 35% of global capacity. What’s more, the country is showing no signs of slowing down. It has the world’s largest wind and solar project in the pipeline, which could add another 400,000MW to its clean energy capacity.
Following China from afar is the U.S., which recently surpassed 100,000MW of solar power capacity after installing another 50,000MW in the first three months of 2021. Annual solar growth in the U.S. has averaged an impressive 42% over the last decade. Policies like the solar investment tax credit, which offers a 26% tax credit on residential and commercial solar systems, have helped propel the industry forward.
Although Australia hosts a fraction of China’s solar capacity, it tops the per capita rankings due to its relatively low population of 26 million people. The Australian continent receives the highest amount of solar radiation of any continent, and over 30% of Australian households now have rooftop solar PV systems.
China: The Solar Champion
In 2020, President Xi Jinping stated that China aims to be carbon neutral by 2060, and the country is taking steps to get there.
China is a leader in the solar industry, and it seems to have cracked the code for the entire solar supply chain. In 2019, Chinese firms produced 66% of the world’s polysilicon, the initial building block of silicon-based photovoltaic (PV) panels. Furthermore, more than three-quarters of solar cells came from China, along with 72% of the world’s PV panels.
With that said, it’s no surprise that 5 of the world’s 10 largest solar parks are in China, and it will likely continue to build more as it transitions to carbon neutrality.
What’s Driving the Rush for Solar Power?
The energy transition is a major factor in the rise of renewables, but solar’s growth is partly due to how cheap it has become over time. Solar energy costs have fallen exponentially over the last decade, and it’s now the cheapest source of new energy generation.
Since 2010, the cost of solar power has seen a 85% decrease, down from $0.28 to $0.04 per kWh. According to MIT researchers, economies of scale have been the single-largest factor in continuing the cost decline for the last decade. In other words, as the world installed and made more solar panels, production became cheaper and more efficient.
This year, solar costs are rising due to supply chain issues, but the rise is likely to be temporary as bottlenecks resolve.
Electrification
How Clean is the Nickel and Lithium in a Battery?
This graphic from Wood Mackenzie shows how nickel and lithium mining can significantly impact the environment, depending on the processes used.

How Clean is the Nickel and Lithium in a Battery?
The production of lithium (Li) and nickel (Ni), two key raw materials for batteries, can produce vastly different emissions profiles.
This graphic from Wood Mackenzie shows how nickel and lithium mining can significantly impact the environment, depending on the processes used for extraction.
Nickel Emissions Per Extraction Process
Nickel is a crucial metal in modern infrastructure and technology, with major uses in stainless steel and alloys. Nickel’s electrical conductivity also makes it ideal for facilitating current flow within battery cells.
Today, there are two major methods of nickel mining:
-
From laterite deposits, which are predominantly found in tropical regions. This involves open-pit mining, where large amounts of soil and overburden need to be removed to access the nickel-rich ore.
-
From sulphide ores, which involves underground or open-pit mining of ore deposits containing nickel sulphide minerals.
Although nickel laterites make up 70% of the world’s nickel reserves, magmatic sulphide deposits produced 60% of the world’s nickel over the last 60 years.
Compared to laterite extraction, sulphide mining typically emits fewer tonnes of CO2 per tonne of nickel equivalent as it involves less soil disturbance and has a smaller physical footprint:
Ore Type | Process | Product | Tonnes of CO2 per tonne of Ni equivalent |
---|---|---|---|
Sulphides | Electric / Flash Smelting | Refined Ni / Matte | 6 |
Laterite | High Pressure Acid Leach (HPAL) | Refined Ni / Mixed Sulpide Precipitate / Mixed Hydroxide Precipitate | 13.7 |
Laterite | Blast Furnace / RKEF | Nickel Pig Iron / Matte | 45.1 |
Nickel extraction from laterites can impose significant environmental impacts, such as deforestation, habitat destruction, and soil erosion.
Additionally, laterite ores often contain high levels of moisture, requiring energy-intensive drying processes to prepare them for further extraction. After extraction, the smelting of laterites requires a significant amount of energy, which is largely sourced from fossil fuels.
Although sulphide mining is cleaner, it poses other environmental challenges. The extraction and processing of sulphide ores can release sulphur compounds and heavy metals into the environment, potentially leading to acid mine drainage and contamination of water sources if not managed properly.
In addition, nickel sulphides are typically more expensive to mine due to their hard rock nature.
Lithium Emissions Per Extraction Process
Lithium is the major ingredient in rechargeable batteries found in phones, hybrid cars, electric bikes, and grid-scale storage systems.
Today, there are two major methods of lithium extraction:
-
From brine, pumping lithium-rich brine from underground aquifers into evaporation ponds, where solar energy evaporates the water and concentrates the lithium content. The concentrated brine is then further processed to extract lithium carbonate or hydroxide.
-
Hard rock mining, or extracting lithium from mineral ores (primarily spodumene) found in pegmatite deposits. Australia, the world’s leading producer of lithium (46.9%), extracts lithium directly from hard rock.
Brine extraction is typically employed in countries with salt flats, such as Chile, Argentina, and China. It is generally considered a lower-cost method, but it can have environmental impacts such as water usage, potential contamination of local water sources, and alteration of ecosystems.
The process, however, emits fewer tonnes of CO2 per tonne of lithium-carbonate-equivalent (LCE) than mining:
Source | Ore Type | Process | Tonnes of CO2 per tonne of LCE |
---|---|---|---|
Mineral | Spodumene | Mine | 9 |
Mineral | Petalite, lepidolite and others | Mine | 8 |
Brine | N/A | Extraction/Evaporation | 3 |
Mining involves drilling, blasting, and crushing the ore, followed by flotation to separate lithium-bearing minerals from other minerals. This type of extraction can have environmental impacts such as land disturbance, energy consumption, and the generation of waste rock and tailings.
Sustainable Production of Lithium and Nickel
Environmentally responsible practices in the extraction and processing of nickel and lithium are essential to ensure the sustainability of the battery supply chain.
This includes implementing stringent environmental regulations, promoting energy efficiency, reducing water consumption, and exploring cleaner technologies. Continued research and development efforts focused on improving extraction methods and minimizing environmental impacts are crucial.
Sign up to Wood Mackenzie’s Inside Track to learn more about the impact of an accelerated energy transition on mining and metals.
Electrification
Life Cycle Emissions: EVs vs. Combustion Engine Vehicles
We look at carbon emissions of electric, hybrid, and combustion engine vehicles through an analysis of their life cycle emissions.

Life Cycle Emissions: EVs vs. Combustion Engine Vehicles
According to the International Energy Agency, the transportation sector is more reliant on fossil fuels than any other sector in the economy. In 2021, it accounted for 37% of all CO2 emissions from end‐use sectors.
To gain insights into how different vehicle types contribute to these emissions, the above graphic visualizes the life cycle emissions of battery electric, hybrid, and internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles using Polestar and Rivian’s Pathway Report.
Production to Disposal: Emissions at Each Stage
Life cycle emissions are the total amount of greenhouse gases emitted throughout a product’s existence, including its production, use, and disposal.
To compare these emissions effectively, a standardized unit called metric tons of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) is used, which accounts for different types of greenhouse gases and their global warming potential.
Here is an overview of the 2021 life cycle emissions of medium-sized electric, hybrid and ICE vehicles in each stage of their life cycles, using tCO2e. These numbers consider a use phase of 16 years and a distance of 240,000 km.
Battery electric vehicle | Hybrid electric vehicle | Internal combustion engine vehicle | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Production emissions (tCO2e) | Battery manufacturing | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Vehicle manufacturing | 9 | 9 | 10 | |
Use phase emissions (tCO2e) | Fuel/electricity production | 26 | 12 | 13 |
Tailpipe emissions | 0 | 24 | 32 | |
Maintenance | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
Post consumer emissions (tCO2e) | End-of-life | -2 | -1 | -1 |
TOTAL | 39 tCO2e | 47 tCO2e | 55 tCO2e |
While it may not be surprising that battery electric vehicles (BEVs) have the lowest life cycle emissions of the three vehicle segments, we can also take some other insights from the data that may not be as obvious at first.
- The production emissions for BEVs are approximately 40% higher than those of hybrid and ICE vehicles. According to a McKinsey & Company study, this high emission intensity can be attributed to the extraction and refining of raw materials like lithium, cobalt, and nickel that are needed for batteries, as well as the energy-intensive manufacturing process of BEVs.
- Electricity production is by far the most emission-intensive stage in a BEVs life cycle. Decarbonizing the electricity sector by implementing renewable and nuclear energy sources can significantly reduce these vehicles’ use phase emissions.
- By recycling materials and components in their end-of-life stages, all vehicle segments can offset a portion of their earlier life cycle emissions.
Accelerating the Transition to Electric Mobility
As we move toward a carbon-neutral economy, battery electric vehicles can play an important role in reducing global CO2 emissions.
Despite their lack of tailpipe emissions, however, it’s good to note that many stages of a BEV’s life cycle are still quite emission-intensive, specifically when it comes to manufacturing and electricity production.
Advancing the sustainability of battery production and fostering the adoption of clean energy sources can, therefore, aid in lowering the emissions of BEVs even further, leading to increased environmental stewardship in the transportation sector.
-
Electrification2 years ago
Ranked: The Top 10 EV Battery Manufacturers
-
Real Assets3 years ago
Visualizing China’s Dominance in Rare Earth Metals
-
Electrification1 year ago
The Key Minerals in an EV Battery
-
Real Assets2 years ago
The World’s Top 10 Gold Mining Companies
-
Misc2 years ago
All the Metals We Mined in One Visualization
-
Misc3 years ago
All the World’s Metals and Minerals in One Visualization
-
Real Assets3 years ago
What is a Commodity Super Cycle?
-
Real Assets3 years ago
How the World’s Top Gold Mining Stocks Performed in 2020