Connect with us

Electrification

The Six Major Types of Lithium-ion Batteries: A Visual Comparison

Published

on

battery technology series part 1 of 2
battery technology series part 2 of 2

types of lithium-ion batteries

The Six Types of Lithium-ion Batteries: A Visual Comparison

Lithium-ion batteries are at the center of the clean energy transition as the key technology powering electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage systems.

However, there are many types of lithium-ion batteries, each with pros and cons.

The above infographic shows the tradeoffs between the six major lithium-ion cathode technologies based on research by Miao et al. and Battery University. This is the first of two infographics in our Battery Technology Series.

Understanding the Six Main Lithium-ion Technologies

Each of the six different types of lithium-ion batteries has a different chemical composition.

The anodes of most lithium-ion batteries are made from graphite. Typically, the mineral composition of the cathode is what changes, making the difference between battery chemistries.

The cathode material typically contains lithium along with other minerals including nickel, manganese, cobalt, or iron. This composition ultimately determines the battery’s capacity, power, performance, cost, safety, and lifespan.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at the six major lithium-ion cathode technologies.

#1: Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide (NMC)

NMC cathodes typically contain large proportions of nickel, which increases the battery’s energy density and allows for longer ranges in EVs. However, high nickel content can make the battery unstable, which is why manganese and cobalt are used to improve thermal stability and safety. Several NMC combinations have seen commercial success, including NMC811 (composed of 80% nickel, 10% manganese, and 10% cobalt), NMC532, and NMC622.

#2: Lithium Nickel Cobalt Aluminum Oxide (NCA)

NCA batteries share nickel-based advantages with NMC, including high energy density and specific power. Instead of manganese, NCA uses aluminum to increase stability. However, NCA cathodes are relatively less safe than other Li-ion technologies, more expensive, and typically only used in high-performance EV models.

#3: Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP)

Due to their use of iron and phosphate instead of nickel and cobalt, LFP batteries are cheaper to make than nickel-based variants. However, they offer lesser specific energy and are more suitable for standard- or short-range EVs. Additionally, LFP is considered one of the safest chemistries and has a long lifespan, enabling its use in energy storage systems.

#4: Lithium Cobalt Oxide (LCO)

Although LCO batteries are highly energy-dense, their drawbacks include a relatively short lifespan, low thermal stability, and limited specific power. Therefore, these batteries are a popular choice for low-load applications like smartphones and laptops, where they can deliver relatively smaller amounts of power for long durations.

#5: Lithium Manganese Oxide (LMO)

Also known as manganese spinel batteries, LMO batteries offer enhanced safety and fast charging and discharging capabilities. In EVs, LMO cathode material is often blended with NMC, where the LMO part provides a high current upon acceleration, and NMC enables longer driving ranges.

#6: Lithium Titanate (LTO)

Unlike the other chemistries above, where the cathode composition makes the difference, LTO batteries use a unique anode surface made of lithium and titanium oxides. These batteries exhibit excellent safety and performance under extreme temperatures but have low capacity and are relatively expensive, limiting their use at scale.

Which Batteries Dominate the EV Market?

Now that we know about the six main types of lithium-ion batteries, which of these dominate the EV market, and how will that change in the future?

To find out, stay tuned for Part 2 of the Battery Technology Series, where we’ll look at the top EV battery chemistries by forecasted market share from 2021 through 2026.

Click for Comments

Electrification

Ranked: The Top Lithium-Ion Battery Producing Countries by 2030

Chinese companies are expected to hold nearly 70% of global battery capacity by decade’s end.

Published

on

This graphic uses exclusive data from our partner, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, to rank the top lithium-ion battery producers by their forecasted gigawatt-hour (GWh) capacity for 2030.

Top Lithium-Ion Battery Producers by 2030

Lithium-ion batteries are essential for a clean economy due to their high energy density and efficiency. They power most portable consumer electronics, such as cell phones and laptops, and are used in the majority of today’s electric vehicles.

This graphic uses exclusive data from our partner, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, to rank the top lithium-ion battery producing countries by their forecasted capacity (measured in gigawatt-hours or GWh) in 2030.

China to Keep Dominance

Chinese companies are expected to account for nearly 70% of global battery capacity by 2030, delivering over 6,200 gigawatt-hours. Chinese giant Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CATL) alone is forecasted to produce more than the combined output from Canada, France, Hungary, Germany, and the UK.

Country2030F capacity (GWh)Top producers
🇨🇳 China6,268.3CATL, BYD, CALB
🇺🇸 U.S.1,260.6Tesla, LGES, SK On
🇩🇪 Germany261.8Tesla, Northvolt, VW
🇭🇺 Hungary210.1CATL, SK On, Samsung
🇨🇦 Canada203.8Northvolt, LGES, VW
🇫🇷 France162.0Verkor, Prologium, ACC
🇰🇷 South Korea94.5LGES, Samsung, SK On
🇬🇧 UK66.9Envision, Tata

Currently, China is home to six of the world’s 10 biggest battery makers. China’s battery dominance is driven by its vertical integration across the entire EV supply chain, from mining metals to producing EVs.

By 2030, the U.S. is expected to be second in battery capacity after China, with 1,261 gigawatt-hours, led by LG Energy Solution and Tesla.

In Europe, Germany is forecasted to lead in lithium-ion battery production, with 262 gigawatt-hours, most of it coming from Tesla. The company currently operates its Giga Berlin plant in the country, Tesla’s first manufacturing location in Europe.

Learn More About Batteries From Visual Capitalist

If you enjoyed this post, be sure to check out Charted: Investment Needed to Meet Battery Demand by 2040. This visualization shows the total capital expenditure (capex) requirements to build capacity to meet future battery demand by 2030 and 2040.

Continue Reading

Electrification

Visualizing the Growth of Chinese Copper Miners

Chinese miners are set to overtake major producers by 2025.

Published

on

Chart comparing copper production of the top three cooper miners with Chinese companies.

Visualizing the Growth of Chinese Copper Miners

China, with its huge manufacturing sector, is by far the biggest consumer of copper.

Currently, 70% of copper used in China is imported. As a result, the country has invested heavily in copper mines to secure future supply.

This graphic uses exclusive data from our partner, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, to compare copper output from the top three global producers with Chinese miners. Since some of the mining operations have shared ownership, this graphic takes into consideration only the portion of production relative to the company’s stake in each mine.

Chinese Miners Set to Overtake Major Producers by 2025

In 2010, Chinese miners produced a total of 1.2 million tonnes of copper. In that same year, the top producer, Chilean state miner Codelco, produced 1.8 million tonnes, while the world’s largest miner and second-largest copper producer, BHP, produced 1 million tonnes.

Over the years, however, Chinese output has surged while major miners have faced challenges. In 2023, Codelco’s production fell to its lowest level in a quarter of a century due to operational problems and project delays.

🇨🇳 China
🌐 Rest of World
Year/millions of tonnesZijinCMOCMMGTonglingOther ChinaBHPFreeportCodelco
20100.0590.0000.0010.0071.0901.0210.9791.760
20110.0610.0000.0010.0060.9560.9590.9591.796
20120.0820.0000.0460.0071.0701.0700.9751.805
20130.1040.0030.1840.0071.5301.1291.0461.791
20140.1160.0140.1490.0071.7531.1261.0741.841
20150.1260.0400.1990.0071.8101.0851.2301.891
20160.1340.0470.3740.0071.9841.0231.3881.827
20170.1780.1550.4220.0111.9780.9951.2221.842
20180.2120.1270.3830.0191.9671.1611.2391.807
20190.2990.1400.3150.0312.0461.1971.1041.706
20200.3770.1730.2720.0662.2901.1471.0811.727
20210.5180.1920.2350.0932.3781.0681.3281.728
20220.7500.2260.2140.1232.4401.1801.3271.553
2023F0.8280.3290.2360.1342.2981.2831.3021.442
2024F0.8860.4600.3010.1212.4211.4231.4211.414
2025F0.9800.4670.3090.1582.4411.4711.3421.531
2026F1.0310.4670.3320.2062.4771.5131.3691.591
2027F1.0360.5680.3320.2552.4671.3831.3451.600
2028F1.0580.6980.3320.2552.4671.1861.2861.580

Meanwhile, China’s biggest copper producer, Zijin Mining, saw its production rise from 0.059 million tonnes in 2010 to 0.8 million tonnes last year.

Combined, Chinese companies produced 3.2 million tonnes of copper in 2023, compared to the combined production of 4 million tonnes by Codelco, Freeport-McMoRan (the biggest copper producer in the U.S.), and BHP.

According to Benchmark Mineral Intelligence data, Chinese miners are forecasted to surpass the three top producers in 2025, with a combined production of 4.4 million tonnes compared to 4.3 million tonnes from Codelco, BHP, and Freeport.

Continue Reading

Subscribe

Popular